Deck Azamina #712487 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 38/100 (±10 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Control
• Format: master-duel

Legality

Main 60 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — trạng thái theo luật lúc đánh giá: Illegal. 1 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Triệu hồi Fusion 1 high‑ATK Azamina monster and attack for game‑ending damage; Control the board với hand traps and floodgates, then finish với removal
• Turn 1 (going first): Set 1 hand trap (Infinite Impermanence or Dominus Impulse), negate opponent's key effects, then use Azamina Debtors or The Hallowed Azamina to Fusion‑Summon 1 boss monster
• Turn 2 (going second): Use the extra card in the 6‑card hand to set 1 hand trap, then on turn 2 activate Super Polymerization or Azamina Debtors to bring out 1 Fusion monster while your opponent is still setting up
• Recovery: Recycle resources với Deception of the Sinful Spoils, Curse of Diabell, or The Gaze of Timaeus to retrieve key cards and re‑establish engine momentum
• After siding: No side deck present; the deck relies on its main‑deck redundancy

Why it scores here

The deck reliably opens its engine thanks to 1 very high chance of drawing at least one core card, and it can summon powerful Azamina Fusion monsters that provide strong offensive pressure. Multiple hand traps and floodgates give it solid interruption resilience, while 1 suite of searchers and recyclers helps recover resources after disruption. However, the illegal over‑copy of Super Polymerization, 1 heavy reliance on three‑copy tech cards, low archetype purity and the absence of 1 side deck lower consistency, efficiency, and pilotability, resulting in 1 modest overall score.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 60, Going First ≈ 55, Going Second ≈ 50, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 45. Modifiers: Illegal copy limit (-15); High brick risk (-5). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional, illegal penalty applied)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening 1 starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.88 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.12 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Very high chance to open 1 core engine
• Multiple powerful Fusion bosses
• Robust interaction suite (negates, floodgates, removal)
• Redundancy in special‑summon routes

Weaknesses

• Illegal due to over‑copy of Super Polymerization
• High brick and garnet risk from many 3‑copy tech cards
• Low archetype purity and many off‑archetype fillers
• No side deck for matchup adaptation
• Complex decision tree reduces pilotability

Critical choke points

• Reliance on Super Polymerization (illegal copy) for quick Fusion
• Need to have specific Azamina Fusion monsters in the Extra Deck
• Timing of hand traps to protect the engine

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: legality status and copy limits; main/extra/side counts; card text excerpts; role_hint_tags; probabilities draw tables
• Observed: usage_statistics core cards present; role_tag_counts for negation and removal
• Inferred: engine accessibility score from core group probability; brick risk from copy histogram and over‑limit card; combo ceiling based on high‑ATK Fusion monsters; combo floor based on lack of recorded combos; resource economy from send‑to‑Mộ and recycle effects; interaction quality from negation/removal tag counts; going‑second board‑breaking from hand‑trap probability; offensive closing power from boss ATK values; main‑deck efficiency from archetype purity; extra‑deck efficiency from breakdown counts; matchup coverage due to missing tournament data; pilotability from complexity and illegal status
• Provisional: meta power (no dated metagame sample)
• Data gaps: no combos supplied — combo floor/median/ceiling is text‑only inference no tournament link — archetype meta‑share and per‑pilot match record absent no win‑rate telemetry exists in YGOVN (going‑first/second, matchup, game‑level, brick/starter/OTK rates) — those signals are Inferred or Unknown Meta Power is Provisional unless 1 dated metagame sample is supplied