Deck Azamina #720894 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel

40 lá Main, 15 Extra, gồm Diabellstar the Black Witch x3, Elzette of the White Forest x3, Mulcharmy Fuwalos x3. Tạo 15/06/2026 bởi YGO Mod.

Deck Azamina Master Duel

Được tạo bởi: YGO Mod (20517634)

Được tạo ngày: Thứ Hai, 15 tháng 6 2026

 
 


Phân tích sức mạnh Deck chính thức
ComboĐộ tin cậy: Trung bìnhĐánh giá ngày 15/06/2026
58± 8/ 100
Điểm sức mạnh
Cấu trúc 62
Độ tin cậy giải 55
Đi trước 67
Đi sau 60

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 58/100 (±8 · Confidence: Medium)

Overall score Value
Structural Deck Power 62
Going First 67
Going Second 60
Meta Power provisional
Tournament Reliability 55
  • Primary strategy: Combo
  • Secondary strategies: Midrange, Control
  • Format: master-duel

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

  • Win condition: Assemble 1 board of interaction (negates, removal, disruption) via Synchro/Fusion summoning; apply pressure through Azamina/Diabell boss monsters.; Generate resource advantage and grind through repeated activation of search and recursion effects.
  • Turn 1 (going first): Summon core monsters (Elzette, Silvy, Diabellstar) to trigger searches; build 1 Synchro board (Baronne, Diabell Queen, Silvera) với layer negation and disruption; leave follow-up resources.
  • Turn 2 (going second): Hold hand traps (Ash, Ghost Belle, Maxx C); use Mulcharmy Fuwalos to draw on opponent Triệu hồi đặc biệts; deploy removal and board-breaker interactions post-board.
  • Recovery: Recursion from Mộ via Silvy (returns Synchro to Extra to resummon), Astellar (Triệu hồi đặc biệt from Mộ), and Rciela search effects; replenish hand via searchers.
  • After siding: Unclear; no side deck provided.

Why it scores here

This Azamina hybrid deck opens its core engine reliably (P[≥1 archetype-core starter in opening 5] ≈ 0.82) and converts into boards với moderate interaction (Synchro negates, removal, disruption), but deviates from the established meta-list by omitting key high-inclusion cards (Azamina Ilia Silvia, Red-Eyes Dark Dragoon, Saint Azamina, Dominus Impulse, Reasoning) and running no side deck. The hand-trap and searcher density is strong, yet the lack of parseable combo boards, missing core cards, and the absence of recorded disruption recovery examples limit confidence in median-turn floor performance and post-side reliability. The deck's system demonstrates coherent Synchro/Fusion payoff, reasonable grind, and interaction layering, but does not rise above mid-tier structural power due to incomplete engine coverage and reconstruction risks after key disruption.

Dimension scores

# Dimension Score Evidence
D1 Engine Accessibility & Consistency 72 P(≥1 archetype-core starter in hand 5) ≈ 0.82 from hypergeometric calculation; 11 core cards (White Forest searchers, Diabellstar, Elzette, Silvy, Astellar) across 40-card main deck (Inferred). Core present 36% vs meta-list 100% (Verified).
D2 Opening-Hand Quality & Brick Management 65 Copy histogram: 8 cards at 3 copies, 16 at 1 copy; ~9.1% exact archetype purity; limited redundancy on conditional starters (e.g., Elzette/Astellar both 1-copy send effects); two 8+ ATK Diabell bosses as soft garnet if unsummoned early (Inferred).
D3 Combo Conversion & Ceiling 68 No parsed combos supplied; inferred ceiling from best possible line: Witch of White Forest search → Silvy/Elzette chain → Synchro into Baronne (negation) + Diabell Queen (search recursion) + Poplar (Mộ setup) ≈ 3-4 end-board cards với interaction (Inferred).
D4 Combo Floor & Median Output 62 No combo aggregates; estimated median from card text: typical line = 2-3 Synchro summons (Baronne or Diabell Queen) + 1-2 searches + 1 disruption negate ≈ PowerIndex 55-65 (Inferred).
D5 Interruption Resilience & Route Redundancy 58 Only 2 redundant full starters (Elzette, Astellar, each 1-copy với send condition); Silvy recursion is Mộ-dependent; if disrupted on Triệu hồi bình thường or search, few alternatives; Mulcharmy Fuwalos is turn-2 draw, not recovery (Inferred).
D6 Resource Economy, Recovery & Grind 64 Searcher density 16 copies (40%); net card advantage ≈ +1 to +2 mỗi lượt via searches and recursion; resource float from Mộ revival; no dedicated recursion cost is limiting compared to meta-lists (Inferred).
D7 End-Board & Interaction Quality 68 End-board interaction: Baronne (negate + destroy), Diabell Queen (Quick-Effect send-for-summon negate), Herald of Arc Light (negate on activation), Infinite Impermanence (3 copies hand trap) suggest ≈3.0 interaction density; no analyzed boards (Inferred).
D8 Going-Second & Board-Breaking Power 62 Going-second split unknown; hand traps Ash + Ghost Belle + Maxx C (10 copies total) enable disruption; Mulcharmy Fuwalos draw effect on opponent Triệu hồi đặc biệt; no board-breaker recursion explicit (Inferred).
D9 Offensive Pressure & Closing Power 55 End-board ATK: Baronne 3000, Diabell Queen 2500, Azamina bosses 1900-2000; no piercing or direct damage in core; closing power relies on Synchro damage, not lethal acceleration (Inferred).
D10 Main Deck Efficiency & Flexibility 60 40-card main deck optimal; 24 distinct cards với only 8 at 3-copy (low redundancy flexibility); archetype purity 9.1% means 91% splash/tech (White Forest engine, hand traps, generics); efficiency moderate (Verified/Inferred).
D11 Extra Deck Efficiency & Coverage 66 15-card Extra Deck: 8 Synchro (Baronne, Diabell Queen, Herald, Silvera, Rciela, others), 6 Fusion (Saint Azamina omitted, Red-Eyes Dragoon omitted), 1 Link (S:P Little Knight). Most slots see play; coverage good but lacks meta-standard bosses (Observed/Verified).
D12 Side Deck Adaptability 0 No side deck (0 cards); cannot adapt post-Match-1; this is 1 structural gap in best-of-3 format (Verified).
D13 Matchup Coverage & Format Fit 50 Archetype meta-share unknown; Azamina inclusion 70% in sample, but this list runs only 36% of core cards vs typical 80%+ in high-rep lists; format fit Provisional; no dated metagame supplied (Provisional).
D14 Pilotability & Error Tolerance 58 Combo chains 3-5 steps per typical line (Witch search → Silvy summon → Synchro → negate setup); multiple decision points (send targets, Synchro choices, recursion order); moderate complexity, not expert-high (Inferred).

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 62, Going First ≈ 67, Going Second ≈ 60, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 55. Modifiers: Missing core cards (36% present vs meta 80%+) (-3); No side deck in best-of-3 format (-2); No parsed combo boards (-1); Strong hand-trap density and searcher redundancy (2). Final formula: 0.80 * Structural (62) + 0.20 * Tournament Reliability (55) = 58 (Meta Provisional; no dated metagame supplied)

Probability & combo summary

  • Opening 1 starter: P(≥1) ≈ — · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.18 (all Inferred)
  • Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
  • Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

  • High opening-hand consistency: P(≥1 starter) ≈ 0.82 from robust 11-card core.
  • Searcher density (16 copies, 40% of Main) enables fast resource generation and recovery.
  • Synchro engine layering: Baronne (negate + destroy), Diabell Queen (recursive negate), Herald Arc Light (spell trap negate) provide multi-axis disruption.
  • Hand-trap portfolio (Ash, Ghost Belle, Maxx C, Infinite Impermanence) strong against opponent plays and draw setup.
  • Flexible Extra Deck: 8 Synchro summons, 6 Fusion bosses, 1 Link offer multiple end-board archetypes.
  • Recursion loops via Silvy (return Synchro to Extra, resummon) and Mộ revival (Astellar, Rciela search) support recovery.

Weaknesses

  • 36% core-card inclusion vs 80%+ in meta-lists; missing Azamina Ilia Silvia (100% inclusion), Red-Eyes Dark Dragoon (90%), Saint Azamina (80%), Dominus Impulse (80%), Reasoning (80%).
  • No side deck in best-of-3 format; zero post-Match adaptation capability.
  • Limited independent starter routes: Elzette and Astellar both 1-copy, conditional on send effects; if Triệu hồi bình thường is disrupted, few fallback options.
  • Soft garnets: 2x Cấp độ 8 Diabell monsters (Diabellstar Vengeance, Diabellze) require specific payoff conditions; early draw liabilities.
  • Median board output unverified; no parsed combo boards means floor/ceiling inference only; possible underperformance vs guide expectations.
  • Single-axis recursion: relies on Mộ-to-field revival; Ash Blossom or similar Mộ-lock disruption halts recovery.
  • No offensive closing power; relies on layered interaction and attrition rather than lethal pressure (max ATK ≈ 3000 from Baronne/bosses, no piercing).

Critical choke points

  • Triệu hồi bình thường disruption (e.g., Breakthrough Skill) on first-turn Elzette or Silvy collapses the entire opening line; no redundant non-Normal starters.
  • Ash Blossom on any White Forest search effect (Witch, Elzette, Silvy, Rciela) stops core engine; 3x Ash in format is standard.
  • No Azamina Ilia Silvia (100% meta): missing Triệu hồi Fusion option and built-in negation recovery; reduces Fusion payoff access.
  • Mộ banish or lock effects (Herald Arc Light on opponent side, or anti-Mộ stun) disable recursion loops and Synchro material setup.
  • Going-second board too small if no disruption: if Synchro line is Veiler'd or negated mid-summon, remaining board is thin; no secondary combo route confirmed.
Priority Remove Add Reason
1 The Gaze of Timaeus (1 copy, tech Fusion summon) Azamina Ilia Silvia (100% inclusion, omni-negate Fusion) Core payoff missing; enables negation recovery and adds redundant Fusion access với superior effect.
2 Astellar of the White Forest (1 copy, conditional sender) Dominus Impulse (80% inclusion, unconditional Spellcaster searcher) Increases consistency and removes conditional send requirement; typical meta choice for robust draw.
3 Deception of the Sinful Spoils (1 copy, Azamina Hiến tế searcher) Reasoning (80% inclusion, draw 1 on Triệu hồi bình thường or level guess; meta staple) Reasoning is consistent draw acceleration; Deception is niche Hiến tế searcher với limited payoff in current list.
4 No side deck (0 cards) Construct best-of-3 side deck Required for tournament play; typical Azamina sides include Lava Golem (stall), That Grass Looks Greener (mill setup), Triple Tactics Thrust (control), and archetype-specific tech. Construct side post-evaluation.
5 The Hallowed Azamina (1 copy, special Fusion summon với Mộ send cost) Consider Saint Azamina (80% inclusion, Synchro + Fusion fusion material) or redundant searcher Hallowed Azamina cost is steep (4 Sinful Spoils Mộ sends per 4 levels); Saint Azamina offers Protection + Fusion setup với lower resource tax.

Evidence & confidence

  • Verified: Deck is Legal (40 Main, 15 Extra, 0 Side; no violations per Master Duel banlist).; Copy histogram: 8 at 3 copies, 16 at 1 copy.; Core inclusion: 9 of 25 meta-core cards present (36%).; Missing core: Azamina Ilia Silvia (100% inclusion), Red-Eyes Dark Dragoon (90%), Saint Azamina (80%), Dominus Impulse (80%), Reasoning (80%), and 11 others.; Extra Deck: 8 Synchro, 6 Fusion, 1 Link (15 total).; Hand trap count: 10 copies (Ash 3, Ghost Belle 3, Maxx C 1, Infinite Impermanence 3).; Searcher count: 16 copies across various effects (Witch, Elzette, Silvy, Astellar, Rciela, etc.).; Archetype purity: 9.1% exact-name Azamina; 40% White Forest engine.
  • Observed: Combo boards: 0 parsed combos in evidence; no observed frequency data for median board or starter conversion.; Tournament context: no tournament link supplied; archetype meta-share and per-pilot record absent.; Guide snippet: mentions 'omni-negate early setup, multiple boss options, some FTK/stun potential' but no detailed frequency.
  • Inferred: Opening-hand consistency P(≥1 core starter in 5) ≈ 0.82 via hypergeometric from 11 core in 40-card main.; Brick estimate ~18% (inverse of 0.82 for first-turn playability).; Median board output: 2–3 Synchro summons + 2–3 searches + 1–2 negation interactions per line (from card text and recurison loops).; Combo ceiling: 4-5 board cards (Baronne + Diabell Queen + Poplar + recursion follow-up) if uninterrupted.; Interruption resilience: limited to Silvy Mộ recursion and hand-trap float; one Triệu hồi bình thường disruption likely collapses opening.; Going-first power ≈ 67 (good opening consistency, moderate layering, weak follow-up recovery).; Going-second power ≈ 60 (hand-trap density compensates for weak board-break).; Tournament Reliability ≈ 55 (strong opening, weak post-disruption, no side deck adaptation).
  • Provisional: Meta Power: null (no dated metagame sample supplied; Azamina archetype meta-share and format positioning unknown).; Archetype fit: Azamina popularity 70% in sample suggests viability, but missing core cards and no tournament link prevent meta-power calibration.; Final Contextual Deck Power 58 ±8: assumes meta-neutral structural evaluation; if dated sample is supplied, Final may shift ±5–10 points.
  • Data gaps: No parsed combo boards: floor, median, ceiling PowerIndex, and resource signatures are text-only inference. No tournament link: archetype meta-share, per-pilot match record, and dated metagame sample absent. No side deck: best-of-3 post-Match adaptation cannot be assessed. No win-rate telemetry: brick rate, going-first/second performance, matchup results, game-level outcomes unknown. No multi-line analysis: only single-best-line (ceiling) inferred; frequency of alternative routes unknown. No disruption recovery data: how often does the deck rebuild after 1 single key interruption? Unknown. Meta Power: Provisional vớiout 1 dated sample; cannot calibrate format fit or archetype performance.

Xem thêm Master Duel

Azamina

Thông tin chi tiết của Azamina

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 
https://ygovietnam.com/
Top