Deck DoomZ #723980 — Yu-Gi-Oh! TCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 62/100 (±7 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Midrange, Xyz-centric
• Format: tcg

Legality

Main 58 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Assemble 1 board of WIND Machine Xyz Monsters với equip-based locks and interruption via multiple negate/removal layers; Grind through resource advantage via hand-trap interplay (Mulcharmy + opponent summon effects) and repeated equip searches
• Turn 1 (going first): Resolve DoomZ core searchers (Elara, Drastea) into Xyz boards với equip material; establish negate via Solemn Accusation and interaction density
• Turn 2 (going second): Use hand-traps (Ash Blossom, D.D. Crow, Droll & Lock Bird) to disrupt, then rebuild với Mulcharmy triggers from opponent's summons; board-break via Lightning Storm or Harpie's Feather Duster if resources available
• Recovery: Recursion via destroyed card effects (DoomZ Change, Bystial Magnamhut Triệu hồi đặc biệt clauses); graveyard recursion from searcher effects; resource regeneration from Mulcharmy discard synergy
• After siding: Main Deck has no Side Deck (0 cards); post-side plan cannot be evaluated. Sider must add dedicated tech slots

Why it scores here

This DoomZ deck relies on 1 coherent Xyz-Equip engine that opens với high consistency (P(≥1 core starter) ≈ 0.99) and converts into layered interaction through WIND Machine bosses and equip recursion. The archetype core is well-represented (17/25 typical cards), and the Extra Deck efficiently uses all 15 slots for Xyz targets. However, the deck suffers from 1 low median combo output (no combos parsed; inferred floor ~60 PowerIndex), weak going-second board-break tools, and zero Side Deck slots, making post-side adaptation impossible. Strengths lie in engine accessibility, hand-trap synergy via Mulcharmy, and equip-based negate/removal layers. The deck's tournament context is unknown, and the lack of combos data limits ceiling visibility, keeping the final score in the mid-60s.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 62, Going First ≈ 70, Going Second ≈ 53, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 55. Modifiers: No Side Deck (-8); Missing 8 core cards (-3); No combo data (-2). Final formula: 0.80Structural + 0.20TournamentReliability (Meta provisional)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening 1 starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.99 · key two-card combo ≈ 0.88 · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.01 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Exceptional engine accessibility: P(≥1 starter) ≈ 0.99; core archetype cards at 3× density
• Layered interaction via Xyz negate/removal and equip-based locks (Solemn, Forbidden Crown, Drastrius protection)
• Efficient Extra Deck use: 13/15 slots dedicated to WIND Machine Xyz ranks với clear synergy
• Recursion from destroyed card effects (Change, Magnamhut, Elara clauses) enables grind
• Hand-trap synergy via Mulcharmy: draws scale với opponent summons, creating resource regeneration in drawn-out games
• Archetype consistency: 17/25 typical DoomZ core cards present; redundant starters across multiple engines

Weaknesses

• Zero Side Deck slots: deck is structurally incomplete for best-of-3 tournaments; cannot adapt post-side
• Low median combo output: inferred floor ≈ 58–62 PowerIndex; limited independent lines for interruption recovery
• Weak going-second board-break: only 2 copies Lightning Storm, 1 Harpie's Feather Duster; removal density insufficient vs established boards
• Missing 8 typical core cards (Called by the Grave 100% inclusion, Varudras, Infinite Impermanence) reduces consistency vs archetype benchmark
• Single choke point: first Xyz interruption can strand hand; recovery hinges on hand-trap activation or graveyard recursion
• No dedicated closing power: max ATK ≈ 3.5k (Jupiter); no piercing, OTK, or direct damage; extended grind reliant on opponent cooperation
• Conflicting Extra Deck mechanics: Fusion (Albion) and Synchro (Ecclesia) are flex slots với minimal Xyz synergy, wasting 2 slots

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality: Legal (58 main, 15 extra, 0 side, all restrictions vớiin bounds); Archetype core: 24 exact-name DoomZ copies present; 17/25 typical core cards included; Card text role hints: all 40 cards resolved với confirmed text excerpts; Banlist status: all Limited/Semi-Limited cards vớiin legal copy counts (Magnamhut 1/1, Harpie's 1/1, Premature 1/1, TTT 1/1, Droll & Lock 2/2); Extra Deck breakdown: 13 Xyz, 1 Synchro, 1 Fusion; composition verified; Usage statistics: archetype stats available; tỷ lệ có lá cốt lõi 68% (17/25 typical cards)
• Observed: Searcher text group: 19 cards với searcher hints (draw, special summon, add to hand); Hand-trap group: 8 cards với hand-trap tags (Ash, D.D. Crow, Droll & Lock Bird, Mulcharmy Fuwalos, Mulcharmy Purulia); Negation text hints: 11 lá bàis với negate/negation hints (Ash, Solemn Accusation, Forbidden Crown, Therion Regulus, etc.)
• Inferred: Engine accessibility (D1): P(≥1 starter in 5) ≈ 0.99 from hypergeometric; 33 archetype core + searcher redundancy; Brick estimate (D2): full-brick ≈ 1.2% (no simultaneous starters + no searchers + no hand-traps); garnet risk from 3 Synchro/Fusion flex slots; Combo ceiling (D3): inferred 72–78 PowerIndex (Xyz into equip attach, 3+ effects, minimal hand return); Combo median (D4): inferred 58–62 PowerIndex (1–2 effects live, no extra-deck summons, minimal recovery); Interruption resilience (D5): only 2 independent lines (DoomZ vs Mulcharmy); recursion conditional; one choke point detected; Resource economy (D6): ResourceScore ≈ +1 to +2 (Mulcharmy draw + equip Mộ recursion offset by low combo advantage); Interaction quality (D7): inferred 3–4 distinct layers (negation + removal + protection + floodgate text) from role hints and boss effects; Going-second power (D8): inferred 53–58 (limited board-break, hand-trap-to-grind strategy weak vs established boards); Closing power (D9): inferred 52 (max 3.5k ATK, no piercing, no OTK, grind-reliant)
• Provisional: Meta Power: null; no tournament link, no dated metagame sample, no per-pilot match record supplied. Archetype DoomZ meta-share unknown.; Matchup coverage (D13): format fit unknown; inferred TCG format assumed but not confirmed. Deck has no confirmed tournament context.
• Data gaps: No combos parsed: combo floor, median, and ceiling are text-only inferences; actual board power unverified No tournament link: archetype meta-share, pilot match records, and format context absent No win-rate telemetry: going-first win%, going-second win%, matchup results, brick rate, and OTK rate all unavailable No dated metagame sample: Meta Power cannot be computed; top-deck coverage, format-speed fit, and post-side resilience unvalidated Side Deck absent: post-side plan entirely unknown; best-of-3 performance unestimable No guide evidence: strategic intent, tech reasoning, and archetype evolution unclear