Deck Nemeses #736552 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 57/100 (±5 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Control
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox
• Format: master-duel

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Control the opponent với hand traps and disruption, then build 1 resilient Xyz/Link board.; Utilize Tistina searchers and Mulcharmy draw engines to generate resources for late‑game pressure.
• Turn 1 (going first): Open với 1 hand trap (Ash Blossom, Infinite Impermanence, etc.) to stop opponent’s key plays, then search 1 Tistina monster and set up 1 quick Xyz summon.
• Turn 2 (going second): Use the six‑card hand to stack multiple hand traps, then on opponent’s turn activate 1 board‑breaker (Full‑Armored Xyz, Totem Bird) or 1 Tistina beatstick.
• Recovery: If the board is broken, recycle resources với Mulcharmy draw effects, Droll & Lock Bird, and the various Tistina searchers to re‑establish 1 monster presence.
• After siding: No side deck is present; the list relies on its built‑in toolbox to adapt.

Why it scores here

The deck reliably opens với 1 hand trap and 1 Tistina searcher in over 90% of opening hands, giving it strong early consistency. Its many disruption tools (negates, floodgates) and draw engines let it survive opponent interference and recover resources. While it lacks 1 high‑damage combo, it can assemble 1 solid Xyz/Link board that pressures opponents in the mid‑game. The wide variety of searchers and flexible extra‑deck slots provide toolbox adaptability, but the absence of 1 side deck and the low archetype purity limit its efficiency and matchup coverage.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Control. Structural ≈ 57.45, Going First ≈ 60, Going Second ≈ 65, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 55. Modifiers: Low archetype purity (-4); No side deck (-6). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening 1 starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.94 · key two‑card combo ≈ — · full‑brick estimate ≈ 0.06 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board‑per‑starter —
• Turn order: 0 going‑first lines vs 0 going‑second lines

Strengths

• Very high opening‑hand consistency for core cards.
• Rich hand‑trap and negation suite for disruption.
• Multiple draw engines to recover resources.

Weaknesses

• Low archetype purity leads to potential brick and inefficiency.
• No side deck limits adaptability in best‑of‑3.
• Lack of 1 defined high‑damage combo reduces ceiling.

Critical choke points

• Reliance on drawing key Tistina monsters early.
• Need for Xyz materials to activate powerful board‑breakers.

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: legality status; card copy counts; gợi ý vai trò
• Inferred: engine accessibility from probability; brick estimate from hypergeometric; resource loops from card text; interaction density from role tags; extra‑deck coverage from card list
• Provisional: matchup coverage
• Data gaps: no combos supplied — combo floor/median/ceiling is text‑only inference no tournament link — archetype meta‑share and per‑pilot match record absent no win‑rate telemetry exists in YGOVN (going‑first/second, matchup, game‑level, brick/starter/OTK rates) — those signals are Inferred or Unknown Meta Power is Provisional unless 1 dated metagame sample is supplied