Deck Thunder Dragon #751174 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Duel Links

The headline math holds. 0.8 × 69.8 + 0.2 × 62 = 68.2, which rounds to the reported 68/100.

Things to weigh before trusting it:

• Dimension average is lower than Structural. The 14 dimension scores average about 66.3, not 69.8. The report doesn't say how Structural is weighted, so I can't confirm that number from the dimensions.
• Most of the score is inference. No combos or boards were supplied, so the D3/D4 ceiling and floor and the 0.99 starter odds rest on card text and hypergeometric estimates, not recorded games.
• Extra Deck usage is undercounted. The data gaps say thống kê sử dụng only matches Main Deck cards, so Colossus, Chaos Angel, Sanaphond and Goddess show as absent. That affects D11 and any core-fit claim.
• Meta and side-deck scores are placeholders. D12, D13 and Meta Power are marked Provisional, so the 68 is really 1 structural read, not 1 meta-adjusted one.

Tell me what you want from this: 1 shorter summary, 1 check of the probability figures, or 1 rewrite for 1 particular audience.