Deck @Ignister #709148 — Yu-Gi-Oh! TCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 54/100 (±8 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Combo, Control
• Format: tcg

Legality

Main 55 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Link Summon-based board control với Maliss and @Ignister engines; grind advantage through repeatable searchers and removal.; Going-second disruption via hand traps and field negation to enable follow-up combos.
• Turn 1 (going first): Open 1 level-3 Maliss or Cyberse starter into Link Summons (Hearts Crypter, Red Ransom) to establish interaction and searcher loops.
• Turn 2 (going second): Deploy hand traps (Ash, Impermanence, Ghost Belle) and floodgates (Dimensional Fissure, Dimension Shifter) to disrupt opponent, then pivot into Maliss removal chain.
• Recovery: Recycle banished Maliss cards via Hearts Crypter and Red Ransom effects; float searches and board presence through each Link Summon.
• After siding: No Side Deck present; structural plan remains unchanged.

Why it scores here

This hybrid Maliss/@Ignister deck balances midrange board control với hand-trap denial, but suffers from inconsistent opening hand quality and 1 missing Side Deck. The core engine (Maliss searchers, @Ignister tuners, Backup recursion) draws together reliably when live (~56% P[≥1 starter in 5]), enabling Link Summons into layered negation and removal chains. However, the deck runs 29 distinct main-deck cards in 55 slots, creating redundancy and brick risk; three separate floodgates (Dimensional Fissure, Dominus Impulse, Dimension Shifter) plus 13 hand traps compress combo slots. Removal lines are dense (25 cards với removal text), supporting grind, but offensive pressure is modest—most bosses range 800–2300 ATK với no piercing or direct-damage payoff. The lack of 1 Side Deck eliminates post-game adaptation, and the 20% adherence to archetype-defined core cards signals 1 tech-heavy build that trades focused consistency for matchup coverage. The deck opens 1 functional plan and survives disruption, but does not convert early advantage into fast wins or recover reliably after 1 single hard lock.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange. Structural ≈ 56, Going First ≈ 61, Going Second ≈ 57, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 52. Modifiers: No Side Deck (-4); High tech density (-2); Engine coherence (2). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening 1 starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.56 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Maliss searcher engine provides consistent float and grind advantage across turns.
• Dense hand-trap suite (13 copies) enables going-second disruption and hand interaction.
• Layered Link-based negation (Hearts Crypter, Red Ransom, Gorgon lock potential) creates durable defensive walls.
• Resource economy sustained through Allure of Darkness and Maliss recursion effects.
• Extra Deck efficiently packed với toolbox flexibility (Accesscode, Decode Heatsoul, Salamangreat line).

Weaknesses

• No Side Deck eliminates post-game adaptation; one-dimensional best-of-3 plan.
• High brick risk: 29 distinct main-deck cards, conflicting Triệu hồi bình thườngs, three separate floodgates in maindeck.
• Offensive pressure modest: no piercing, no direct-damage payoff; closure relies on attrition.
• 20% core-card adherence (only 5/25 archetype-defined cards run) signals over-reliance on tech for matchup coverage.
• Combo ceiling moderate due to hand-trap density compressing summon chains; single-choke-point vulnerability if T1 starter bricked.

Critical choke points

• If opening hand lacks both 1 Maliss L3 and Backup @Ignister, deck cannot bootstrap into Link Summon; no alternate tutor line.
• Maliss

  Dormouse is only 1-copy tunable effect for in-deck consistency; redundancy risk if drawn early.

• Three separate banish-interaction effects (Dimensional Fissure, Dominus Impulse, Dimension Shifter) create resource conflict; only one typically live mỗi lượt.
• No hard-lock board; 1 single Ash on T1 starter or Impermanence on first Link Summon can collapse lines into low-interaction state.
• Missing core extras (Linguriboh, Link Disciple, Link Spider, Cyberse Wicckid, S:P Little Knight, I:P Masquerena) limits combo extension and flexibility.

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality: Legal TCG, 55 main, 15 extra, 0 side, no copy-limit violations.; Card text: all 44 distinct cards resolved and excerpt-confirmed.; Restricted cards: 10 Limited/Semi-Limited cards run vớiin legal copy bounds.; Extra Deck composition: 15 all-Link, 8 Cyberse-tag (Maliss/Code Talker/Kuriboh/Salamangreat aligned).; Archetype purity: 7.1% exact-name @Ignister, 25.7% Maliss, 4.8% Bystial, 47.1% generic/tech.
• Observed: Usage statistics: 5/25 archetype-core cards present (Maliss Dormouse, Called by Grave, Infinite Impermanence x3, Maliss TB-11, Maliss White Rabbit x2); 20% core inclusion.
• Inferred: D1 Consistency: P(≥1 Maliss L3 or Backup in hand 5) ≈ 0.56 from hypergeometric.; D2 Brick estimate: 29 distinct cards in 55 slots; no two-card combos documented; 13 hand traps risk clunky openers.; D3 Combo ceiling: Text-read infers T1 outcome = 2–3 Link Summons (Hearts Crypter, Red Ransom) + 2 searches + 1–2 negations ≈ 72 proxy PowerIndex.; D4 Combo median: No recorded boards; inferred ~54 (moderate interaction board, not full combo).; D5 Resilience: Two independent Link lines + Bystial removal + Backup recovery; lacks unbreakable loop.; D6 Resource economy: Maliss searcher loop + Allure draw sustains mid-game grind; net advantage over 3+ turns moderate.; D7 Interaction: ~2.8 interactions per board (Hearts Crypter, Red Ransom negation, Gorgon lock); 29 dedicated interaction cards (hand traps + floodgates + removal).; D8 Going-second: 13 hand traps + 6 dedicated board breakers; no going-second combo split data; estimated ~59.; D9 Offense: End-board ATK 2300 (Allied Code, Accesscode, Decode) với no piercing; closure attrition-based.; D10 Efficiency: 55 main (non-standard but legal); 29 distinct + 13 hand traps compress combo slots.; D11 Extra: 15/15 Link all allocated; Maliss suite + toolbox; ~8 mandatory, ~7 flex.; D12 Side: 0/15; no post-side plan.; D13 Format fit: @Ignister/Maliss niche; no dated metagame sample; provisional.; D14 Pilotability: Maliss lines require 3–4 decisions; moderate complexity.
• Provisional: Meta Power: no tournament link; archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent; @Ignister/Maliss hybrid meta-share unknown.; D13 Matchup coverage: Estimated based on tech density alone; actual meta fit requires dated metagame sample.
• Data gaps: No combo boards recorded — combo floor, median, and ceiling are text-only inference; chỉ số sức mạnh cao nhất, bàn cuối mỗi starter, độ đa dạng starter unavailable. No tournament link — archetype meta-share, per-pilot match record, and format-win-rate telemetry absent. No win-rate telemetry — going-first/second split performance, brick rates, starter success rates, OTK rates, matchup outcomes all unknown. No dated metagame sample — Meta Power and format-fit confidence remain provisional. No Side Deck — post-game plan cannot be evaluated; best-of-3 reliability uncalibrated.