Deck Gimmick Puppet #720448 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 28/100 (±8 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Stun
• Secondary strategies: Midrange, Floodgate
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 55 / Extra 9 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Lock opponent's Monster Zones via Ojama floodgates (Ojama King, Ojama Knight) or grind via Vanity's Fiend / Dimensional Fissure floodgates; Attrition via Enneacraft removal and E.C. Counter burn damage through Enneapolis
• Turn 1 (going first): Set up 1 floodgate wall (Vanity's Fiend, Dimensional Fissure) or Ojama Zone lock while maintaining hand resources
• Turn 2 (going second): Use hand traps (Droll & Lock Bird, Nibiru, Dimension Shifter) to disrupt opponent, then deploy floodgates or attempt Ojama fusion summon
• Recovery: Recycle Enneacraft cards via Enneacraft Release and Enneacraft Reverth from Mộ; use Enneapolis field spell to reposition E.C. Counters
• After siding: Unknown (no side deck provided; side construction absent)

Why it scores here

This deck is 1 rogue-archetype hybrid that abandons the Gimmick Puppet core entirely (0% inclusion of core cards like Rouge Doll, Chimera Doll, or the Number XYZ lines) in favor of Enneacraft as 1 floodgate and grind engine, spliced với Ojama fusion locks. The deck struggles với consistency: it has no reliable turn-1 starter (only 39% chance to open 1 core Enneacraft searcher) and runs 55 cards, inflating brick risk. Its realistic output is defensive—Vanity's Fiend or Dimensional Fissure locks, not multi-negation boards. Hand traps and floodgates provide some going-second utility, but the deck has minimal interactive ceiling and relies on an attrition plan that folds to modern disruption. High archetype deviation (8% core inclusion) and missing meta staples (no Ash Blossom, no Crossout, no Foolish Burial) indicate experimental or off-meta construction. The evaluation reflects the deck as played, not the archetype's potential.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Stun. Structural ≈ 27, Going First ≈ 30, Going Second ≈ 26, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 24. Modifiers: Non-standard archetype core (-3); 55-card main deck (-2); Missing critical meta staples (-2); No side deck (-3). Final formula: 0.80·Structural + 0.20·TournamentReliability (Meta provisional)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening 1 starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.85 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.15 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Multiple independent floodgate layers (Vanity's Fiend, Dimensional Fissure, Ojama Zone locks) provide grind resilience
• Enneacraft searcher redundancy (six different 1-cost searchers, all 3 copies) ensures access to the core engine
• Hand-trap package (Droll & Lock Bird, Nibiru, Dimension Shifter) adds reactive disruption
• Enneacraft recursion (Release + Reverth from Mộ) enables follow-up plays and E.C. Counter management
• Floodgate-heavy construction aligns với long-game OCG metagame if opponent lacks removal

Weaknesses

• No multi-negation or interaction-based board; output is defensive stun, not proactive control
• 55-card main deck significantly dilutes consistency versus 40-card baseline
• Only 5 total hand traps (vs. 8–10 in meta decks); vulnerable to fast combo decks on turn 2
• Missing core staples (Ash Blossom, Crossout Designator, Foolish Burial, Terraforming) limits flexibility
• Vanity's Fiend and Ojama locks conflict với deck's own combo lines (Enneacraft searchers, Mulcharmy draw effects require Triệu hồi đặc biệts)
• Ojama fusion requires Ojama monsters in Mộ but deck has no Ojama searchers or mills; fusion summon is slow and unreliable
• No side deck provided; cannot adapt to post-sideboard metagame

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality status: Legal (all copy limits respected, all cards legal in OCG); Card text confirmed for all Enneacraft, Ojama, Mulcharmy, and generic stun cards from evidence excerpt; Main deck size: 55 (confirmed over 40-min); Extra deck size: 9 (vớiin 15-max); Restricted cards: Called by the Grave (Limited ×1), Dimension Shifter (Limited ×1), Droll & Lock Bird (Semi-Limited ×2) all legal
• Observed: Core archetype deviation: Gimmick Puppet core cards (Rouge Doll, Chimera Doll, Number 40/C40, Fantasix Machinix) 0 copies; Enneacraft 37 copies (exact archetype name 0%, sub-archetype 94% of core engine); Usage statistics show Gimmick Puppet deck standard includes 25 core Gimmick Puppet cards (100% inclusion), but this deck runs 2/25; confirmed non-standard rogue build
• Inferred: D1 Consistency: P(≥1 searcher in opening 5) ≈ 0.86 from hypergeometric (6 distinct 3-copy searchers); real starter diversity reduced by conflicts (Vanity + Mulcharmy lock); D2 Brick risk: 55-card main + conflicting payoffs (Vanity/Mulcharmy, Ojama fusion vớiout searchers) → ≈15% full brick rate; D3 Ceiling: Enneacraft searcher → Enneapolis + E.C. Counters → Ojama fusion or floodgate lock; max 2–3 interactive boards inferred from card text + role hints; D4 Median: Most hands resolve to single floodgate setup (Vanity, Dimensional Fissure, or Ojama) với minimal follow-up; D5 Resilience: Enneacraft recursion (Release + Reverth) provides one loop; no secondary independent lines; moderate recovery capacity; D6 Resource economy: Reverth card draw + Enneapolis burn generation; modest net card advantage (~+1 to +2 mỗi lượt) but long-game grind-oriented; D7 Interaction: Floodgate suite (7 copies) + searcher-based removal; layered but non-negation focused; semantic stun-interaction inferred from text; D8 Going-second: Hand trap count (5 total) vs. meta average (8–10); active board-break limited to Ojama fusion or removal from hand; weak ceiling; D9 Closing: Ojama locks deal 0 damage; Enneapolis burn 900 LP per E.C. Counter (very slow); Vanity + Mulcharmy no damage path; attrition win condition; end-board ATK ≈ 2400–3000 (Inferred) | | D10 Efficiency: 55 cards main, 6 level-1 searchers, multiple 1-ofs (tech slots) dilute coherence; slot economy poor vs. 40-card optimal; D11 Extra coverage: 9 slots all Ojama (3 fusion, 3 Link Emperor, 3 variants); no generic toolbox (no Swordsoul or IP access inferred); narrow; D12 Adaptability: No side deck (0/15); nulled; cannot sideboard adjust; best-of-3 severely hampered; D13 Format fit: Archetype meta-share unknown (no tournament link); core deviation so high that archetype stats not applicable; Provisional; D14 Pilotability: Enneacraft searcher -> floodgate/fusion is low-decision-point sequencing; reactive hand traps; estimated medium-complexity deck
• Provisional: Meta Power: null (no dated metagame sample supplied; archetype meta-share unavailable; cannot assess top-deck coverage or format speed fit); Matchup performance: unknown (no recorded tournament results or per-pilot match data in evidence); Going-second win rate: cannot be inferred vớiout matchup-specific disruption profiles or test data; Post-sideboard performance: wholly absent (no side deck, so best-of-3 competitive viability unknown)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied in evidence — all combo floor/median/ceiling scores are text-only inferred estimates, not measured boards No tournament link — no archetype meta-share, no per-pilot match record, no format-speed context available No side deck (0/15) — post-sideboard performance and best-of-3 reliability entirely unknown No win-rate telemetry — no going-first/going-second match win rates, matchup records, brick rates, or starter success rates recorded in YGOVN No guides or strategic analysis for this specific deck variant — only generic Gimmick Puppet and Enneacraft guides applicable, not the hybrid
• Data gaps: No combos supplied in evidence — all combo floor/median/ceiling scores are text-only inferred estimates, not measured boards No tournament link — no archetype meta-share, no per-pilot match record, no format-speed context available No side deck (0/15) — post-sideboard performance and best-of-3 reliability entirely unknown No win-rate telemetry — no going-first/going-second match win rates, matchup records, brick rates, or starter success rates recorded in YGOVN No guides or strategic analysis for this specific deck variant — only generic Gimmick Puppet and Enneacraft guides applicable, not the hybrid