Deck Melffy #720449 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 28/100 (±8 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Stun
• Secondary strategies: Midrange, Floodgate
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 55 / Extra 9 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Lock opponent via floodgates (Vanity's Fiend, Dimensional Fissure, Ojama board locks) and grind advantage over multiple turns; Ojama fusion lock (Ojama King / Ojama Knight) blocking monster zones; Egyptian God tribulation lock với Ra Sphere Mode
• Turn 1 (going first): Set up Dimensional Fissure or Vanity's Fiend floodgate; build Ojama fusion setup in Extra Deck for mid-game lock
• Turn 2 (going second): Use hand traps (Nibiru, Droll & Lock Bird, Dimension Shifter) to disrupt opponent's combo; activate floodgates post-disruption
• Recovery: Grind via Mulcharmy Fuwalos draw effect when opponent special summons; recycle resources through Enneacraft searchers and Enneacraft Reverth
• After siding: Likely remove some floodgates if sided against, add more hand traps or board breakers; side card count unknown (0 sideboard cards in list)

Why it scores here

This deck abandons the core Melffy engine entirely (0% archetype-specific core cards present) and instead layers floodgates, hand traps, and Ojama fusion locks as its primary game plan. The deck reliably opens Dimensional Fissure or Vanity's Fiend (~25% per 3-of in opening 5 cards), and has heavy hand-trap density (5 copies, ~45% going-second) to disrupt opponents. However, it lacks 1 coherent self-contained combo line: Enneacraft cards enable searching and modest grind via Mulcharmy Fuwalos, but there is no documented board or finish condition. The scoring reflects 1 stun/midrange shell với reasonable floodgate layering and hand-trap coverage, but severely limited offensive output, inconsistent starter access, and zero sideboard flexibility. Popularity or archetype name did not influence scoring; the deck is evaluated as 1 functional stun list với significant structural gaps.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Stun. Structural ≈ 25, Going First ≈ 32, Going Second ≈ 26, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 24. Modifiers: Archetype core abandonment (-12); Empty sideboard (-5); No combo evidence (-3); Floodgate layering strength (4). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening 1 starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.5 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.18 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Multi-vector floodgate layering: Vanity's Fiend (hard Triệu hồi đặc biệt lock), Dimensional Fissure (Mộ denial), Droll & Lock Bird (searcher denial) form 1 cohesive disruption suite
• Strong hand-trap density going second (5 copies, ~45% opening) enables reactive disruption against combo-heavy meta
• Ojama fusion payoff (King/Knight) provides unconventional board lock when generators are present (external risk)
• Enneacraft searcher redundancy (17 copies flagged) supports modest recycling and grind recovery
• Legal and fully resolved deck với no banlist violations

Weaknesses

• Zero Melffy core cards (0/25 standard inclusions) — deck is 1 rogue stun hybrid, not 1 true Melffy list
• No coherent first-turn combo line or demonstrable board; floodgates are the primary game plan, leaving turn-2 vulnerable
• Ojama fusion setup incomplete: Extra Deck slots allocated (6 Ojama fusions) but no Ojama beast generators in main deck; fusion summoning requires external setup
• Mulcharmy Fuwalos is the only non-Enneacraft engine card; insufficient engine cohesion for consistent access to grind tools
• Empty sideboard (0 cards) eliminates post-side adaptation in best-of-3 format; critical tournament liability
• Ra Sphere Mode (2 copies) requires tribute and does not Triệu hồi đặc biệt; integration với floodgate lock is unclear
• No board breaker density (no MST, Typhoon, or removal-to-searcher synergy) limits going-second offensive capability
• Extremely high brick rate: 18 triple-copy level-1 Enneacraft pendulums flood hands vớiout engines to convert them into advantage

Critical choke points

• Vanity's Fiend + Dimensional Fissure stack requires exact timing; incorrect sequencing loses lock integrity
• Ojama fusion construction requires both Ojama generators and fusion catalyst — generators are absent from the main deck, making fusion payoff inaccessible vớiout external enabler cards
• Floodgate-dependent strategy fails against hand-trap-heavy going-second hands or opponent disruption (Droll & Lock Bird on opponent's turn negates Enneacraft searchers)
• Empty sideboard means the deck cannot adapt to unfavorable matchups in games 2 and 3; first-game stun must hold
• Mulcharmy Fuwalos grind engine only triggers on opponent special summons; inactive against control or stun mirrors
• No backup win condition: if floodgates are cleared (MST, Typhoon, Feather Duster) or blocked (Imperial Order), deck loses primary game plan and has minimal offensive output (3000 ATK Enneacraft bosses, 2 copies max)

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Deck is Legal (OCG format, all card copy counts vớiin banlist limits); Main Deck 55 cards, Extra Deck 9 cards, Side Deck 0 cards; Restricted cards: Called by the Grave (Limited, 1 copy), Dimension Shifter (Limited, 1 copy), Droll & Lock Bird (Semi-Limited, 2 copies) — all vớiin legal limit; Card text confirms Vanity's Fiend, Dimensional Fissure, Ojama King/Knight are floodgates; Mulcharmy Fuwalos triggers on opponent special summons; Enneacraft cards have searcher and removal text
• Observed: Melffy core card inclusion: 1 of 25 standard core cards present (Mulcharmy Fuwalos; 4% purity); Hand trap density: 5 cards (Nibiru 2×, Droll & Lock Bird 2×, Dimension Shifter 1×); ~45% probability opening at least one going-second; Searcher text flags: 17 cards flagged với searcher text (Enneacraft cards + Enneacraft Release/Reverth); Removal text flags: 30 cards với removal-related text; Negation text flags: 14 cards
• Inferred: Enneacraft core accessibility: P(≥1 of 12 Enneacraft starters in opening 5) ≈ 50%; P(full brick, no floodgate or starter) ≈ 18%; Combo ceiling: Enneacraft Reverth (draw by shuffling pendulums) + Mulcharmy Fuwalos (draw on opponent summon) enables modest grind; no first-turn board documented, limiting T1 ceiling to floodgate setup (~50 PowerIndex equivalent); Floodgate interaction density: Vanity's Fiend + Dimensional Fissure + Droll & Lock Bird overlap creates multi-layer stun; layering quality ~3.1 interactions per grind turn (semantic inference from text); Ojama payoff inaccessibility: Extra Deck has 6 Ojama fusion slots but zero Ojama generators in main deck; fusion summoning requires external enabler, making payoff conditional/unreliable; Grind sustainability: Enneacraft recursion (Release, Reverth) + Mulcharmy draw form positive resource loop; quantified as moderate grind capacity vớiout metric (Inferred)
• Provisional: Meta Power: no dated metagame sample provided; archetype meta-share unavailable; deck is rogue hybrid, not standard Melffy or recognized format staple. Provisional until tournament performance data emerges.; Going-first board strength: vớiout combo evidence, inferred as 'floodgate setup' (low interactive ceiling); tournament reliability depends on meta speed and hand-trap prevalence (Provisional); Post-side stability: empty sideboard makes all post-side claims Provisional; cannot assess transformation capability or matchup resilience in games 2/3
• Data gaps: No combo evidence: zero parsed board records limit validation of grind/recursion synergies and ceiling analysis No tournament link: archetype meta-share, per-pilot match record, win rates, and metagame context absent No sideboard cards: empty sideboard eliminates post-side planning and transformation analysis for best-of-3 format No win-rate telemetry: YGOVN lacks going-first/second win rates, matchup-specific records, brick rates, OTK rates, game length — all modal signals are Inferred or Unknown No guides: no archetype guides or strategy documents provided; strategic intent inferred from card text only Card resolution uncertainty: Ojama fusion payoff integration unclear (no Ojama generators in deck); Ra Sphere Mode role unexplained; Enneacraft-Ojama synergy undocumented