Deck Enneacraft #733751 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 62/100 (±8 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Control
• Secondary strategies: Midrange, Burn
• Format: master-duel

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Pendulum lock + burn damage via Enneapolis E.C. Counter accumulation or board stun; Floodgate lock (Vanity's Fiend) + grind với removal and recovery
• Turn 1 (going first): Establish dual Pendulum Zones với high-level Enneacraft bosses (3000 ATK walls), set interaction via Enneacraft Reset negation, accumulate E.C. Counters for end-of-turn burn
• Turn 2 (going second): Use The Fallen & The Virtuous for removal, leverage Charmer Links to recycle opponent's monsters, board-break and pivot into stun
• Recovery: Banish Enneacraft Release from Mộ to float Extra Deck bosses back to hand; use Enneacraft Reverth shuffle-and-draw to recycle resources
• After siding: No side deck available (Master Duel best-of-1); post-side adaptation not applicable

Why it scores here

Enneacraft is 1 pure control deck anchored on consistent pendulum-zone establishment and burn-via-counter accumulation. The deck reliably opens at least one Cấp độ-1 searcher (~94.9% via searcher density) and can establish 1 functional lock by setting Enneapolis + negation via Enneacraft Reset. However, vớiout combo evidence the ceiling is unclear and the median output leans mid-range rather than explosive; no hand-trap coverage and high reliance on Pendulum Zones create vulnerabilities. Resource recovery through float mechanics (Reverth shuffle-draw, Release Mộ recursion) is solid, but turn-2 and recovery-after-disruption are unproven. The score reflects 1 competent, archetype-coherent system that trades explosive combo for consistency and grind potential, penalized by absence of going-second tools and the hard-cap of best-of-1 format.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Control. Structural ≈ 61, Going First ≈ 68, Going Second ≈ 62, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 57. Modifiers: Engine compactness & archetype coherence (2); No going-second hand traps (-1); Best-of-1 format (no side) (-2). Final formula: 0.80Structural(61) + 0.20TournamentReliability(57) + ContextModifiers(+1) = Final 62 (Meta provisional, no dated sample supplied)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening 1 starter: P(≥1) ≈ — · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Extremely reliable core opener: 8 Cấp độ-1 searchers (94.9% draw rate in hand 5) ensure Pendulum Zone access in 95%+ openers
• Coherent archetype với strong internal synergy: 63.6% exact-name purity, 87.5% of archetype-core cards present, minimal dead slots
• Solid grind & resource recovery: Enneacraft Reverth shuffle-draw, Enneacraft Release Mộ float, 17 searcher-text cards keep fuel flowing through long games
• Control interaction density: 12 negation-text cards (pendulum destruction, effect negation via Reset), 30 removal-text mentions, 2 floodgates enable multi-layer defense
• Charmer toolbox (6 copies): enables going-second recycling and provides out-of-archetype flexibility for matchups
• Main/Extra Deck efficiency: 40 slots tight với no wasted cards; 15-card Extra well-balanced (7 Links, 4 XYZ, 3 Synchro, 1 Fusion) với redundant Cấp độ-9 XYZ bosses

Weaknesses

• No combo evidence: ceiling and median output are text-only inferred, not observed; potential upside unknown or ceiling lower than similar control decks
• Pendulum-zone dependency: entire lock strategy pivots on dual Pendulum Zones; one disruption (Twin Twisters, Mystical Space Typhoon) can collapse the board if no backup lines ready
• Zero hand-trap coverage: Maxx C (70% archetype inclusion) missing; no early-game interaction going second vs explosive opponent setups
• Moderate offensive pressure: 3000 ATK bosses not exceptional; Enneapolis burn (900 LP/turn) slow; no OTK or alternative fast close
• Limited independent lines: searcher effects text-identical across 4 cards (tromarIA/oknirIA/orgIA/alazoneIA), disrupting one searcher type doesn't branch into other combos
• Best-of-1 format (Master Duel): no side deck to pivot post-game; no adaptability to hostile meta, one-shot performance only
• Vanity's Fiend (2 copies) conflicts: locks own Triệu hồi đặc biệts, requires careful sequencing to not brick own plays

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Deck legality: Legal (40 main, 15 extra, 0 side, no violations); Card text and banlist status: all cards Unlimited, all text resolved; Copy counts and archetype composition: 63.6% exact-name purity, 35 Enneacraft / 20 off-archetype; Archetype-core presence: 14 of 16 top-usage cards present (87.5%); missing Maxx C (70.6%) and Albion Branded (52.9%); Extra Deck breakdown: 7 Links, 4 XYZ, 3 Synchro, 1 Fusion (total 15)
• Observed: P(≥1 Cấp độ-1 searcher in hand 5) ≈ 0.94 via hypergeometric, per evidence probabilities table; Searcher-text card density: 17 copies total (per số lá theo vai trò), enabling consistent bootstrapping
• Inferred: Consistency score (D1 = 75): inferred from P(starter live) ≈ 0.94, searcher redundancy (8 distinct Cấp độ-1 searchers at 3 copies each), and archetype-core coherence; Brick management (D2 = 68): inferred from duplicate searcher effects (tromarIA/oknirIA/orgIA/alazoneIA identical Pendulum text) and Vanity's Fiend conflict; Combo conversion ceiling (D3 = 58): inferred from card text (dual Pendulum + 2–3 boss negators + Reset negation = estimated 3–4 layer board); no scored boards provided; Combo floor/median (D4 = 54): inferred as mid-range grind output (dual Pendulum setup + removal loop) rather than explosive turn-1; Interruption resilience (D5 = 62): inferred from single-choke dependency (dual Pendulum Zone), moderate float recovery (Release, Reverth), limited independent lines; Resource economy (D6 = 71): inferred from Reverth shuffle-draw net-zero cost, Release Mộ recursion, and 17 searcher + 30 removal-text card density enabling long-game fuel; End-board interaction (D7 = 68): inferred from 12 negation-text mentions (Atori.MAR/Asta.PIXEA/Atil.SPIA pendulum destruction, Enneacraft Reset, XYZ negations), floodgate count (Vanity's Fiend × 2), and Charmer recycling breadth; Going-second board-breaking (D8 = 65): inferred from The Fallen & The Virtuous single removal + Charmer toolbox (6 Links) vs no dedicated board wipe or hand-traps; Offensive closing (D9 = 48): inferred from 3000 ATK bosses (moderate offensively), Enneapolis burn (900 LP/turn, slow), no piercing/direct damage text, no OTK lines; Main Deck efficiency (D10 = 72): inferred from 40-card tight list, 16 distinct cards, 63.6% exact-name purity, minimal flex slots; Extra Deck efficiency (D11 = 66): inferred from 15/15 utilization, balanced multi-type coverage (7 Links, 4 XYZ, 3 Synchro, 1 Fusion), redundant Cấp độ-9 boss options; Pilotability (D14 = 55): inferred from deterministic pendulum-zone setup but moderate decision complexity in grind phases, error tolerance via resource recovery
• Provisional: Meta Power: null (no dated metagame sample supplied; archetype meta-share and tournament context unavailable); Matchup coverage (D13 = 58): Enneacraft niche positioning in Master Duel vs Swordsoul/Branded/Edison unclear; archetype-level meta-share unknown
• Data gaps: No combo boards scored: dữ liệu combo contains zero scored boards; combo floor/median/ceiling are text-only inferred No tournament context: dữ liệu giải đấu.available = false; no archetype meta-share, per-pilot records, or format positioning data No win-rate telemetry: YGOVN lacks going-first/second, matchup, game-level, brick/starter rates; consistency and meta-fit are inferred or provisional Master Duel best-of-1 eliminates post-side performance data: D12 = 0 by format constraint, not deck weakness No dated metagame sample: Meta Power remains provisional; final score uses only Structural + TournamentReliability