Deck Invoked #736239 — Yu-Gi-Oh! TCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 62/100 (±6 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Midrange, Control
• Format: tcg

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Triệu hồi Fusion Invoked bosses and Magistus Fusion monsters to control the board through negation and removal while grinding out advantages; Setup going-second disruption via Magistus engine and hand traps to break opponent's board and switch into beatdown
• Turn 1 (going first): Open với Aleister searchers and Magical Meltdown, establish Fusion engines (Invoked Mechaba, Oceanulus, or Magistus Zoroark), float through searches and soft locks
• Turn 2 (going second): Leverage 6-card hand for hand traps (Ash, Infinite Impermanence); use Super Polymerization and removal Fusions to clear established boards; switch to beatdown với available attackers
• Recovery: Banish zones via Invoked Oceanulus; recycle Fusions and Aleister from Mộ via Invocation/Sacred Spirit Sword; Mulcharmy Fuwalos draws on opponent Triệu hồi đặc biệts
• After siding: No side deck supplied; structural plan remains unchanged post-side

Why it scores here

This Invoked hybrid reliably opens Aleister searchers (99.93% archetype core live) and Magical Meltdown to establish Fusion engines, but lacks 1 strong going-second plan vớiout Droll & Lock Bird or key defensive Fusions like Raidjin and Augoeides. The deck can produce mid-tier Fusion bosses (Mechaba, Oceanulus) với soft negation and removal, yet median output is constrained by limited independent combo lines and 1 single-card dependency chain around Aleister. Mulcharmy Fuwalos and hand traps offer resilience, but disruption recovery is hindered by slow recursion and no redundant starters. The deck's core is consistent, but construction gaps (missing 12 of 25 core cards, no side deck) and limited board diversity cap ceiling and reliability. Score reflects going-first consistency and engine cohesion tempered by going-second weakness and median combo floor.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 61, Going First ≈ 68, Going Second ≈ 54, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 57. Modifiers: Missing core Fusions penalty (-3); No side deck (-2). Final formula: 0.80Structural (61) + 0.20TournamentReliability (57) = 62 (Meta provisional, no dated sample)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening 1 starter: P(≥1) ≈ 1 · key two-card combo ≈ 0.85 · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.08 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Extremely consistent Aleister engine: P(≥1) ≈ 99.93%; Magical Meltdown tutor guarantees Invocation access on T1
• Strong going-first board: Invoked Mechaba/Oceanulus soft-lock + negation + removal provides layered interaction
• Flexible Fusion suite: 10 distinct Extra Deck Fusions cover multiple matchup angles (negation, removal, recursion, soft locks)
• Hand-trap density + tech flexibility: 5 hand traps + Called by the Grave + Triple Tactics Talent provide going-second tools
• Recursion lines via Invocation and Sacred Spirit Sword enable mid-game refloat and extended grind
• Mulcharmy Fuwalos conditional draw engine can generate advantage on opponent's Triệu hồi đặc biệts

Weaknesses

• Missing 12 of 25 core cards (52% standard hit rate): no Droll & Lock Bird, Raidjin, Augoeides, Sorath, or key defensive Fusions weakens both T1 and T2 plans
• Low interrupt recovery: single choke point on Aleister; if disrupted early, alternate lines are limited (Aiwass is conditional, slower)
• Going-second weakness: only 57.7% P(≥1 hand trap in 6); lacks Raidjin/Augoeides defensive board-breaker removal; relies on Super Polymerization which competes for deck space
• Median combo floor is modest: starter diversity low (Aleister variants dominate); most T1 boards resolve to 1 Fusion + searches, not multi-negate boards
• No side deck: cannot adapt to matchups post-Game 1; best-of-3 tournament reliability severely hampered
• Spell-heavy main deck creates tension: Aleister searchers + Magical Meltdown + Invocation recursion + tech Spells compete for Triệu hồi bình thường and Mộ space
• Extra Deck slots constrained: 15-card limit forces flex choices (Garura, S:P Little Knight) over full Fusion suite consistency

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Deck is Legal (TCG format, 40 main / 15 extra / 0 side); Aleister the Invoker (3x), Magical Meltdown (3x), Invocation (2x) are core consistency engines; Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring, Infinite Impermanence, Called by the Grave, Triple Tactics Talent are hand traps / techs present; Extra Deck contains 10 Fusion, 5 Link (verified from card list); Archetype core usage stats available: 52% of 25-card standard present
• Observed: Invoked bosses (Mechaba, Oceanulus, Baybarron, Sorath, Raidjin, Augoeides) are documented in Extra Deck or missing from deck; Magistus subset (Spenta, Zoroa, Artemis, Chorozo) provides secondary engine layer; Mulcharmy Fuwalos (3x) is present but conditional (requires 0 cards on field)
• Inferred: P(≥1 Aleister + Magical Meltdown T1) ≈ 0.72 hypergeometric from probabilities table; Archetype core P(live) ≈ 99.93% from probabilities.archetype_core_group; Full-brick probability estimated ~8% (no starters, no searchers, no field) on T1 hand 5; Best-line combo: Aleister + Meltdown + Aiwass → Mechaba/Oceanulus + negation + float; ceiling ~2 interrupts + 2–3 searches; Median combo floor: single Fusion + 1–2 searches, limited independent lines (starter diversity ~2–3 distinct paths); Going-first Power ≈ 68 from D1 (72) + D7 (66) + D5 (52) + D6 (62) blend; Going-second Power ≈ 54 from low hand-trap draw rate (57.7% P≥1 in 6), missing defensive Fusions, reliance on Super Poly; Mulcharmy Fuwalos condition conflict reduces integration value despite draw upside; Magistus/Mulcharmy tech is intentional deviation from 100% standard; suggests deliberate meta pivot or budget build
• Provisional: Meta Power = null; no dated metagame sample, tournament link, or archetype meta-share percentile provided; Matchup coverage unknown; Invoked's position vs 2026 Q3 TCG meta is speculative vớiout live tournament data; Best-of-3 reliability severely limited by absent side deck; post-side power cannot be assessed
• Data gaps: No combos_evidence supplied: no sample boards, no median_power_index, no best_line PowerIndex, no board_per_starter frequency. All combo floor/median/ceiling inferred from card text and role hints. No tournament context: archetype meta-share, per-pilot match record, format-level stats absent. Meta Power is Provisional. No side deck (0/15): cannot evaluate post-side adaptation, matchup tuning, or best-of-3 reliability. No win-rate telemetry in YGOVN: brick rate, starter-accessibility rate, going-first/second performance, OTK frequency all Inferred or Unknown. No guides_evidence: archetype strategy guides empty; strategic intent inferred from card text and usage stats only. No dated metagame snapshot: cannot anchor matchup fit or format speed calculations; D13 remains Provisional.