Deck Endymion #771832 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

This is 1 deck evaluation report, but there's no request in your message. Here's the read, and I can act on whichever part you want.

Verdict: 33/100 (±8, medium confidence). The deck is illegal as listed, so the score is capped and theoretical.

Fix before any evaluation counts:

1. Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring runs 3 copies against 1 limit of 2. Cut 1.
2. Super Polymerization runs 3 copies against 1 limit of 2. Cut 1.
3. Extra Deck has 16 cards against 1 cap of 15. Cut 1.
4. The passcode 86120751 didn't resolve to 1 lá bài. Check it, since it's counted as main deck.
5. The export has no side deck, so the post-side score (D12 = 5) is 1 placeholder.

Where the report is weak:

• "70 of 54 main cards are off-archetype" can't be right, since more off-archetype cards than main deck cards is impossible. Probably 1 counting bug in the evaluator. Check it before relying on D1, D2, or D10.
• The 0.26 starter probability checks out. It's the chance of at least one copy of 1 3-copy card in 1 5-card opening hand from the 54-card main deck (the Extra Deck isn't drawn). Good.
• The final score checks out: 0.80 × 46 + 0.20 × 35 = 43.8, then −8 and −3 gives 32.8 ≈ 33.
• The dimension scores average to about 44, not the stated structural 46. Minor, but it suggests weighting that isn't shown.
• No recorded boards or combos, so the ceiling, median, and meta are inference or placeholder. Treat them as provisional.

My suggestion: make the three cuts, then rerun the evaluation. Do you want me to draft the corrected list (I'd need the decklist, since the report doesn't include card names beyond these few), or check the evaluator's off-archetype count if you have its source?