Deck Cynet #714355 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 32/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Midrange, Control
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — trạng thái theo luật lúc đánh giá: Illegal. 4 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Build 1 Maliss-centric Link board với negation and removal, then grind through multiple turns với trap recursion and special summons; Use hand traps and Maliss trap monsters to disrupt the opponent's plays while establishing board control
• Turn 1 (going first): Establish 1 Maliss Link monster với traps Set in Mộ, leveraging banish effects and field control to lock the opponent
• Turn 2 (going second): Use hand traps (Ash, Impermanence, Dimension Shifter) to interrupt combo, then attempt recovery via Maliss trap recursion and Link access
• Recovery: Recursion via Maliss trap effects (GWC-06, TB-11, MTP-07) to rebuild board; use banish mechanics to thin deck and fuel monster effects
• After siding: Unknown — no side deck provided

Why it scores here

This deck is illegal in OCG (running 3 copies each of two Semi-Limited cards plus 2 Forbidden cards: Maxx "C" and Link Decoder), so it receives 1 theoretical/structural-only evaluation. The core Maliss engine appears moderately coherent, mixing Cấp độ-3 Cyberse starters (Backup @Ignister, Maliss

White Rabbit/Chessy Cat) với trap-based recursion and banish synergies. However, vớiout parsed combo data, the actual board power and consistency are text-only inference; the deck runs 27 distinct Main cards from 40 slots, creating moderate brick risk. Hand-trap density (8 copies) provides decent disruption, but the 0% core-card inclusion rate relative to archetype standards suggests deviation. The deck's reliance on Maliss trap recursion and the fragmented @Ignister/Cyber/Dominus engine splice limits reliable opening lines and post-disruption recovery.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 35, Going First ≈ 42, Going Second ≈ 38, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 28. Modifiers: Illegal deck penalty (-15); No combo data (-8); Missing core cards + side deck (-5). Final formula: Structural only (Illegal deck — theoretical evaluation). 0.75Structural + 0.25TournamentReliability, capped at 40 due to legality violations.

Probability & combo summary

• Opening 1 starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.34 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.18 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Redundant Cấp độ-3 Cyberse starters (Backup @Ignister, Maliss

  White Rabbit, Chessy Cat, March Hare) provide multiple entry points into Maliss engine.

• Maliss trap recursion (GWC-06, TB-11, MTP-07) enables repeatable special summons and search loops; banish-based fuel system is fuel-efficient.
• Hand-trap density (8 copies: Ash, Impermanence, Dimension Shifter, Droll & Lock Bird, Mulcharmy Fuwalos) offers decent disruption and going-second tools.
• Extra-Deck includes utility Link-1/2 starters (Linguriboh, Cyberse Wicckid) and scaled bosses (Perfectron Hydradrive Dragon, Firewall Dragon); good coverage.
• Interaction quality via Maliss Links (negation + removal) and generic board breakers (Transcode Talker, Accesscode Talker path) suggests multi-faceted control.

Weaknesses

• ILLEGAL — contains 4 copy-limit violations: Maxx "C" (Forbidden), Link Decoder (Forbidden), Maliss in Underground (×3 vs ×2 Semi-Limited), Maliss

  White Rabbit (×3 vs ×2 Semi-Limited). Deck cannot be played in OCG.

• 27 distinct Main Deck cards from 40 slots creates high variance and brick risk; no garnet hedges for Ritual/Fusion payoffs.
• Missing 2 of 4 core archetype cards (Accesscode Talker 60%, Transcode Talker 51%); suggests off-meta construction or deliberate tech choices, lowering consistency.
• No parsed combo data — ceiling, median output, and starter-to-board conversion unknown; all combo claims are text-only inference.
• No side deck (0 cards) — cannot evaluate best-of-3 adaptation; post-side power unknown.
• Maliss engine splice với @Ignister/Cyber/Dominus creates potential engine conflicts; single disruption often breaks lines vớiout clear second path.
• Limited offensive closing power; Perfectron Hydradrive Dragon is primary finisher but damage output (burn effect + ATK ~5000) modest vs. established boards.
• Pilotability risk: trap recursion + banish looping + multi-phase loops increase error surface under time pressure.

Critical choke points

• Opening hand: Without 1 Cấp độ-3 starter, the Maliss engine does not activate; hypergeometric P(brick) ≈ 0.18–0.22, creating frequent non-games.
• First disruption (opponent's turn): If 1 key Link monster is destroyed or the trap recursion is interrupted, the deck often lacks independent recovery lines; ~2 paths only.
• mộ interaction: Heavy reliance on banish effects and Mộ recursion makes decks running Dimensional Shifter, Droll & Lock Bird, or graveyard-lock floodgates severe matchup hazards.
• Extra-Deck capacity: Limited to 15 slots; Maliss Links (Hearts Crypter, White Binder) compete với generic Link utility (Firewall, Linguriboh, Cyberse Wicckid); flex slots tight.

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Deck is Illegal per OCG banlist (copy-limit violations confirmed via lá bị hạn chế array); Main Deck 40 cards, Extra Deck 15 cards, Side Deck 0 cards (legal size structure correct); Card frames, attributes, races, levels resolved; text excerpts match official card database; 8 hand-trap cards (Infinite Impermanence ×3, Ash Blossom ×2, Dimension Shifter, Droll & Lock Bird, Mulcharmy Fuwalos) confirmed; 14 Link Monsters in Extra Deck, 1 Fusion (Cyberse Desavewurm); Link rating and attribute totals verified
• Observed: Usage statistics show Backup @Ignister and Code of Soul as core (>50% inclusion); Accesscode Talker and Transcode Talker missing despite 51–60% archetype presence; Role-hint tags for all cards (negation, removal, searcher, special_summon detected); 19 removal-text cards identified, 9 negation-text cards identified
• Inferred: P(≥1 three-copy starter) ≈ 0.34 in opening 5 (hypergeometric; no combo lines to validate); estimated brick rate ~18–22%; Starter diversity: 7 distinct starters across Maliss + @Ignister; median independence ~2 lines only (no parsed combos confirm); End-board interaction: Maliss Links (Hearts Crypter, White Binder) reach 2–3 negation/removal pieces; semantic read from text; power index unknown; Going-first vs going-second split: hand-trap weight (8 copies) suggests going-second focus; going-first board likely mid-size (~3–4 interaction pieces); Pilotability: Maliss trap recursion + banish looping + multi-phase sequencing inferred as medium complexity; no decision-point count or error-tolerance metric available; Combo floor: Estimated 32–36 pending board audit; assumes 2–3 summons per line với 1–2 interaction pieces; no confirmed data; Combo ceiling: Estimated 40–50 pending full board lines; likely Perfectron Hydradrive Dragon + Firewall Dragon + Maliss interaction stack
• Provisional: Meta Power = null; no dated metagame sample provided; Cynet/Maliss archetype meta-share in OCG unknown; Matchup fit unknown; deck's graveyard/banish reliance is weak vs. Dimensional Shifter/Droll & Lock Bird decks; estimated meta-fit 35 pending environment
• Data gaps: No combos parsed from evidence.json (tổng số combo: 0) — combo ceiling, median output, board-per-starter, and resource signatures entirely inferred from text No tournament context supplied — archetype meta-share, pilot match records, and format win-rate absent; Meta Power marked Provisional No win-rate telemetry in YGOVN — going-first/second performance, matchup rates, brick/OTK rates, and per-player performance unknown No side deck provided (0 cards) — post-side plan, adaptation quality, and best-of-3 reliability cannot be evaluated; D12 side deck adaptability set to 0 (unverifiable) No guides attached (tổng số hướng dẫn: 0) — strategic intent, combo step count, and pilotability signals absent; all pilotability claims inferred from card text complexity Illegal deck status — cannot compete; all scores are theoretical/structural-only; real-world performance data absent No starter-independence data — number of real independent lines vs. single-line reliance unknown; estimated ~2 paths but unconfirmed